Richard III Cause Of Death: Two Blows To The Head

No helmet? He deserved it.

Richard III Cause Of Death: Two Blows To The Head
Reuters
Posted: 09/16/2014 7:01 pm EDT Updated: 2 hours ago

By Kate Kelland

LONDON (Reuters) - Scientists in Britain have given blow-by-blow details of King Richard III’s death at the Battle of Bosworth more than 500 years ago and say two of many blows to his bare head could have killed him very swiftly.

Their analysis of the remains of the last English monarch to die in battle suggest he was attacked by one or more people, and that nine of 11 blows, clearly inflicted in battle, were to his skull and another possibly fatal blow was to his pelvis. The findings also support previous opinion that he had no helmet on.

The head injuries are consistent with some near-contemporary accounts of the battle, the researchers said in findings published in The Lancet medical journal on Wednesday.

“The wounds to the skull suggest that he was not wearing a helmet, and the absence of defensive wounds on his arms and hands indicate that he was otherwise still armored at the time of his death,” said Sarah Hainsworth, a professor of materials engineering at Leicester University, who co-led the study.

The remains of King Richard III were found by archaeologists under a municipal car park in the central English city of Leicester in 2012 and subsequently identified by experts from the city’s university.

A court ruled in May this year that the king should be reburied near to where he was slain in battle, dashing the hopes of descendants who had wanted his remains to be taken back to his northern English stronghold of York.

According to historical record, the monarch was killed in battle on Bosworth Field, near Leicester, on Aug. 22, 1485, and those accounts suggest Richard was forced to abandon his horse after it became stuck in a mire and was then killed fighting.

His death was the culmination of the Wars of the Roses, a bloody 30-year power struggle between Richard’s House of York and the rival House of Lancaster.

Hainsworth’s team used whole body computerized tomography (CT) scans and micro-CT imaging to analyze trauma to the bones and determine which of Richard’s wounds might have proved fatal.

They also analyzed tool marks on bone to identify the medieval weapons potentially responsible for his injuries.

According to Guy Rutty, a pathologist on the research team, “the most likely injuries to have caused the king’s death are the two to the inferior aspect of the skull – a large sharp force trauma possibly from a sword or staff weapon, such as a halberd or bill, and a penetrating injury from the tip of an edged weapon.”

Now that’s a helmet
http://stream1.gifsoup.com/view4/2174911/hound-helm-o.gif

If only he had had a horse, he could have had a Kingdom!

It’s a shame. He was great in Richard III.

I find it fascinating that they could locate and verify living descendents.

There’s power in the blood of kings.

DNA, ever heard of it?

Databases?

Oh, they kept DNA databases in the 15, 16, 17, 1800s? Wow. I did not know that. Thanks for enlightening me.

If you weren’t a;ways itching to climb down my throat, you would know that they had to do a lot of research to determine who MIGHT be his descendants. Einstein. The only time DNA came into play was once they had determined who the descendants were.

You are fucking dumb.

They test the remains…get a DNA analysis and then they follow Y chromosome markers and then if they match in a database…BINGO. But that’s a boring story to tell, so they make it sound hard.

I know who the fuck I descended from in Spain and I haven’t had any DNA analysis done. Human keep records, stupid.

Fucking retard.

You’re the retard. That’s not how they did it. Fucking moron. Read up on it. Do you think everyone ever born is in a database somewhere?

They had to determine who the descendants were BEFORE they could use his DNA to make comparisons. They didn’t just run his DNA info through a database that included DNA info for everyone ever born since he was born. God, you are a complete and utter idiot.

I found out from a recent DNA test that I’m 0.2% Nignog and 0.1% Kike.

I think the tech had had lunch at KFC before they did your test.

So is Sammy Davis JR like your babby Daddy, or what?

Whatever moron.

You don’t believe that terrorists took down the Twin Towers, even as you saw it with your own eyes…but do believe it’s a big fucking deal to find descendants with DNA analysis in a group that’s as small as the English people.

Tells me a few things about your massive stupidity.

There’s probably a decent chance that I’m descended from that asshole too.

Oak, why don’t you try reading about how they figured it out and then post. Right now you’re just displaying your ignorance.

fuck off stupid cunt

Could it be because you’re also descended from Anglo/Saxon and Celtic people?

No fucking way! lol

I bet the researchers in England had to work super hard at eliminating most of the 7 billion people on the planet from their research.

I mean, really…it’s hard work.

LMAO. Stock response from a troll who doesn’t know wtf she’s talking about.

fuck off cunt